Murray Rothbard once wrote
that even the most brutal dictator ultimately bases his power on the opinions
that are held by a majority of the population that is under his rule. After all,
even dictators with large armies tend to be vastly outnumbered by the
populations they rule over, and revolution is always on the dictator's mind.
That's probably how he gained power himself in the first place the previous
dictator was, well, too dictatorial and created the conditions for his own
overthrow.
Democratic regimes also base their legitimacy on their ability to claim that
their rule is "the will of the people." They believe in democracy with all their
will, they tell us, so much so that generations of American politicians have
believed that it was legitimate to wage war on other nations and to kill
thousands of their citizens to impose "democracy" on them. Lincoln's armies
killed some 300,000 fellow citizens and maimed for life an even greater number,
supposedly so that "government of the people, by the people, for the people,"
i.e., democracy, shall not perish from the earth.
This of course was pure B.S.: Had the South seceded peacefully, democracy would
have still existed in the U.S., the Confederate States of America, Canada,
England, France, etc., etc. Nevertheless, that was an official purpose of the
war, and of numerous other American wars. Woodrow Wilson brought America into
World War I to supposedly "make the world safe for democracy." We are now
supposedly bringing democracy to Iraq at bayonet point with numerous other
Middle East countries in our sights.
But America was not founded as a democracy. It was a constitutional republic.
The whole purpose of the Constitution, James Madison wrote in Federalist #10,
was to control "the violence of faction," by which he meant democracy. That's
why, until the Lincolnian "Civil War Amendments" were added to it, every part of
the Constitution was a prohibition of some kind of governmental power or
activity. Democracy was made into a "civil religion" by Lincoln and subsequent
generations of Lincolnites who have successfully overthrown the constitutional
republic of the founding fathers.
These constitutional prohibitions or limitations are all but ignored today, of
course. The Constitution does not provide for the central government to get
involved in education, let alone sending a man and untold millions or billions
of dollar to Mars. There are no longer any constitutional limitations
on the central government. Washington politicians laugh and sneer at libertarian
think tank employees who occasionally appear before their committees to oppose
this or that government program on constitutional grounds. They laugh and say to
them, "we've got the power to do it, and we're going to do it." I've seen it
with my own eyes on C-SPAN.
President Clinton's Surgeon General, Joycelyn Elders, went so far as to assert
that the constitution allowed for a federal masturbation education program. Even
Bill Clinton thought that went a little too far and fired the good doctor.
The Republican Party today stands for an explosive growth of the welfare state
and is spending money on such programs as fast as Lyndon Johnson ever did. The
Democrats are as bad or worse.
On foreign policy the Republican Party is dominated by crazed Wilsonians who
want to involve the U.S. military in perpetual global warfare "to spread
democracy." As with all such imperialistic ventures, this would eventually
bankrupt the country and create countless enemies who would like nothing better
than to destroy us by the millions with nuclear weapons or poison. The Democrats
are as bad or worse.
Both political parties are competing to grant amnesty to all illegal aliens, as
the first step along the way to allowing completely open borders. Combining open
borders with an explosively growing welfare state will invite all the deadbeats
of the world to come to America, with all their extended family members in tow,
to "celebrate democracy" by voting themselves more and more of the hard-earned
dollars of those of us who work for a living in this country. This would cause
the welfare state to eventually eat up a huge portion of national income,
probably half or more. American taxpayers would be nothing but docile slaves to
the Washington, D.C. plantation.
The government schools long ago gave up teaching anything significant about the
founding fathers, the Constitution, and the philosophy of limited government
other than to trash and demean them. In a democracy it is not in the state's
best interest to educate its own citizens about the virtues of limited
government, and ours doesn't. And it certainly will never make any attempt to do
so with the hordes of new immigrants it hopes to attract (and register to vote).
Belief in the Constitution is essentially a lost cause.
That's why it is unpatriotic to vote. Being patriotic in America means being
devoted to the Constitution, if not the natural rights philosophy that motivated
much of it. Since neither of the major political parties has any interest
whatsoever in enforcing the constitutional limitations on the state, they are
all traitors to the Constitution (with one lone exception, Congressman Ron
Paul).
Anyone who supports them is also behaving in a traitorous manner. That is,
anyone who votes for any of them. Voting only allows these traitors to
the Constitution to proclaim that "the people have spoken" and "I am your
president," or congressman, senator, governor, or whatever. Their legitimacy
rests solely on their ability to make this claim.
Imagine what a patriotic thrill you would receive if, in the next presidential
election, a mere 10 percent of the electorate, instead of the usual 50 percent
or so, voted. The unconstitutional regime in Washington would be de-legitimized.
The upside is that it might just be possible that some politicians in Washington
would get the message and start behaving more like a George Washington or Thomas
Jefferson than a Tony Soprano or Vito Corleone (with apologies to all the
distinguished Italian-Americans out there). The downside is that they will keep
on behaving as they do now with complete contempt for the Constitution and the
population it is supposed to benefit.
So be patriotic:
Don't vote.

Thomas DiLorenzo is professor of economics at
Loyola College, Maryland, and a senior fellow at the
Ludwig von Mises Institute. He is the
author or co-author of ten books, on subjects such as antitrust,
group-interest politics, and interventionism generally.
The secret to becoming a good American Patriot is to
educate yourself to the history and philosophy of America.
There is no better place to begin your
education then in the virtual classroom of Professor DiLorenzo.
Click above for more
Thomas J. DiLorenzo [send him mail] is
professor of economics at Loyola College in Maryland and the author of
The
Real Lincoln;
Lincoln Unmasked: What You're Not Supposed To Know about Dishonest Abe
and
How Capitalism Saved America. His latest book,
Hamilton's Curse: How Jefferson's Archenemy Betrayed the American Revolution
And What It Means for America Today, will be published on October 21.
Copyright © 2008 LewRockwell.com
Read this page:
And if you think Dr. DiLorenzo is the only one...CLICKME!